4.4 Article

Psychotic symptoms in young adults exposed to childhood trauma-A 20 year follow-up study

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 127, 期 1-3, 页码 76-82

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.12.010

关键词

Childhood trauma; Psychotic symptoms; Brain function

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [ID 201813, 300403]
  2. University of Adelaide Data Management and Analysis Centre
  3. Births Deaths and Marriages Registration Office of South Australia
  4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
  5. Australian Electoral Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Childhood adversity has been shown to increase the risk of psychotic symptoms in adult life. However, there are no previous studies looking at the association between experiencing a natural disaster during childhood and the development of psychotic symptoms in young adulthood. Eight hundred and six bushfire-exposed children and 725 control children were evaluated following the 1983 South Australian bushfires. Five hundred and twenty nine (65.6%) of the bushfire group and 464 (64%) controls participated in a follow up study 20 years later. Childhood data on emotional and behavioural disorders and dysfunctional parenting was available. The adult assessment included the Australian National Health and Well-Being psychosis screen and detailed information about trauma, childhood adversity and alcohol and cannabis abuse. 5.6% of subjects responded positively to the psychosis screen and 2.6% responded positively to a further probe question. Psychotic symptoms were more common in subjects exposed to a greater number of traumas, and were associated with higher rates of childhood adversity, emotional and behavioural disturbance, dysfunctional parenting, and alcohol and cannabis abuse. Subjects exposed to bushfires as children did not have a greater risk of psychosis. Our results indicate that exposure to multiple traumas, rather than a single major trauma, increases the risk of later psychosis. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据