4.4 Article

18F-Fallypride binding potential in patients with schizophrenia compared to healthy controls

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 122, 期 1-3, 页码 43-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.03.043

关键词

Schizophrenia; Dopamine; Molecular imaging; Positron emission tomography; Thalamus; Cortex

资金

  1. Kettering Health Network Foundation
  2. Boonshoft Schizophrenia Center
  3. Anatomy and function of the thalamus in schizophrenia [MH60023]
  4. United States Air Force, Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL/HEOP), Air Force Materiel Command [F33615-98-2-6002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Molecular imaging of dopaminergic parameters has contributed to the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia, expanding our understanding of pathophysiology, clinical phenomenology and treatment. Our aim in this study was to compare F-18-fallypride binding potential BPND in a group of patients with schizophrenia-spectrum illness vs. controls, with a particular focus on the cortex and thalamus. Methods: We acquired F-18-fallypride positron emission tomography images on 33 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (28 with schizophrenia; 5 with schizoaffective disorder) and 18 normal controls. Twenty-four patients were absolutely neuroleptic naive and nine were previously medicated, although only four had a lifetime neuroleptic exposure of greater than two weeks. Parametric images of F-18-fallypride BPND were calculated to compare binding across subjects. Results: Decreased BPND was observed in the medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus, prefrontal cortex, lateral temporal lobe and primary auditory cortex. These findings were most marked in subjects who had never previously received medication. Conclusions: The regions with decreased BPND tend to match brain regions previously reported to show alterations in metabolic activity and blood flow and areas associated with the symptoms of schizophrenia. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据