4.6 Review

Perception Measurement in Clinical Trials of Schizophrenia: Promising Paradigms From CNTRICS

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 163-181

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbn156

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) [MH43292, MH66374, MH61824]
  3. National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) [DA02925]
  4. US Veteran's Administration VISN 22 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center
  5. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  6. Janssen
  7. AstraZeneca
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH043292, R01MH061824, R01MH066374, R01MH052885, R29MH043292] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA002925] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The third meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (CNTRICS) focused on selecting promising measures for each of the cognitive constructs selected in the first CNTRICS meeting. In the domain of perception, the 2 constructs of interest were gain control and visual integration. CNTRICS received 5 task nominations for gain control and three task nominations for visual integration. The breakout group for perception evaluated the degree to which each of these tasks met prespecified criteria. For gain control, the breakout group for perception believed that 2 of the tasks (prepulse inhibition of startle and mismatch negativity) were already mature and in the process of being incorporated into multisite clinical trials. However, the breakout group recommended that steady-state visual-evoked potentials be combined with contrast sensitivity to magnocellular vs parvocellular biased stimuli and that this combined task and the contrast-contrast effect task be recommended for translation for use in clinical trial contexts in schizophrenia research. For visual integration, the breakout group recommended the Contour Integration and Coherent Motion tasks for translation for use in clinical trials. This manuscript describes the ways in which each of these tasks met the criteria used by the breakout group to evaluate and recommend tasks for further development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据