4.0 Article

Evaluation of A-Site Ba2+-Deficient Ba1-xCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-δ Oxides as Electrocatalysts for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

期刊

SCANNING
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2018/1341608

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research (Discipline Arrangement) project - Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20170412154554048]
  2. Peacock Team Project - Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [KQTD2015033110182370]
  3. National Key Research and Development Project - Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0202400, 2016YFA0202404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exploring earth-abundant and cost-effective catalysts with high activity and stability for a hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is of great importance to practical applications of alkaline water electrolysis. Here, we report on A-site Ba2+-deficiency doping as an effective strategy to enhance the electrochemical activity of BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-delta for HER, which is related to the formation of oxygen vacancies around active Co?Fe ions. By comparison with the benchmarking Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-delta, one of the most spotlighted perovskite oxides, the Ba0.95Co0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-delta oxide has lower overpotential and smaller Tafel slope. Furthermore, the Ba0.95Co0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-delta catalyst is ultrastable in an alkaline solution. The enhanced HER performance originated from the increased active atoms adjacent to oxygen vacancies on the surface of the Ba0.95Co0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-delta catalyst induced by Ba2+-deficiency doping. The low-coordinated active atoms and adjacent oxygen ions may play the role of heterojunctions that synergistically facilitate the Volmer process and thus render stimulated HER catalytic activity. The preliminary results suggest that Ba2+-deficiency doping is a feasible method to tailor the physical and electrochemical properties of perovskite, and that Ba0.95Co0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-delta is a potential catalyst for HER.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据