4.0 Article

Structural Organization of the Cytoskeleton in SV40 Human Corneal Epithelial Cells Cultured on Nano- and Microscale Grooves

期刊

SCANNING
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 405-413

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/sca.20123

关键词

adhesion; cornea; cytoskeleton; epithelium; filopodia; holes; morphology; nanoscale; pattern; proliferation; topography

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY016134-01A2, R01 EY017367-01A1, R01 EY017367, P30 EY016665-01, P30 EY016665, R01 EY016134] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The basement membrane of human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs) has a three-dimensional nanoscale architecture, which includes pores, bumps and fibers that may influence cell-substrate adhesion and spreading in the overlying cells. We previously demonstrated that nano- and microscale groove and ridge patterns influence the morphological response and the adhesive response of HCECs to a nominal wall shear stress. Cell-substrate adhesion is mediated by adhesion receptors that bind to extracellular matrix components and anchor the cytoskeleton (CSK) of cells to extracellular elements. Here we investigate the CSK organization in SV40-transformed HCECs grown on nano- and microscale groove and ridge patterns. X-ray lithography was used to fabricate uniform groove and ridge patterns with features ranging in size from 200 nm to 2 mu m grooves. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy were used to investigate CSK structure and the distribution of -beta 1 integrin adhesion receptors. CSK elements aligned with the patterns; however, the spatial organization of these elements was influenced by feature size. Larger CSK bundles lay on top of the ridges and ran parallel to the patterns, whereas smaller CSK bundles, whose width was proportional to the groove size, spanned the grooves. -beta 1 integrins co-localized with the CSK and had a higher density at the poles of aligned spindle-shaped cells. Differences in organization seen on the different topographical feature sizes may be indicative

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据