4.0 Article

Association of IRF5 gene polymorphisms with rheumatoid arthritis in a Tunisian population

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 414-418

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03009740802256327

关键词

-

资金

  1. Association Francaise des Polyarthritiques
  2. Association Rhumatisme et Travail
  3. European Union for AutoCure
  4. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur
  5. de la Recherche Scientifique de la Technologie (Tunisia)
  6. International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) Trieste (Italy)
  7. Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal [SFRH/BD/23304/2005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: A strong genetic association of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) gene has been described previously in a Swedish population, although this result was not confirmed in a French population. We undertook an association study between IRF5 and the RA phenotype, as well as a study with serological markers of RA, in a Tunisian population. Methods: A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; rs2004640) was genotyped using a Taqman 5' allelic discrimination assay on an ABI 7500 real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) instrument in 140 RA patients and 185 controls. Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Association was assessed based on the chi(2) test and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The frequency of the TT genotype of the IRF5 SNP rs2004640 differed significantly between patients and controls (p=0.01). This difference was greater when a subgroup of patients with another 'autoimmune' disorder was considered (p=0.007). A weak but significant association was also found in a subgroup of patients who were positive for ACPA (p=0.04) or erosion (p=0.01). Conclusions: Our results indicate that the TT genotype of the IRF5 (rs2004640) dimorphism is associated with RA in a Tunisian population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据