4.3 Article

Non-participation in a field survey with respect to psychiatric disorders

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 728-736

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1403494808092250

关键词

attrition; birth cohort; follow-up; non-participation; survey

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  4. Lundbeck Foundation
  5. Research Foundation of Orion Corporation
  6. Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Higher rates of psychiatric morbidity among non-participants may lead to biased estimates of prevalence and incidence in epidemiological studies of psychiatric disorders. We had a unique opportunity to explore psychiatric morbidity and non-participation in a large epidemiological survey including questionnaires and a clinical examination. Methods: Members of the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort were included in the study. In phase I, a postal questionnaire was mailed to all those with a known address in 1997 (N=11,540). In phase II, all subjects living in northern Finland or the Helsinki area (N=8463) were invited to a clinical examination. In phase III, clinical examination participants were given a questionnaire with psychological subscales to be filled in at home and returned by mail. The data on hospital-treated psychiatric disorders were obtained from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Educational level was obtained from Statistics Finland. Results: The participation rates were 76%, 71% and 61% in phases I, II and III, respectively. Subjects with any psychiatric disorder participated less actively than those without any psychiatric disorder in all phases, in both genders and at all educational levels. Participation was not found to vary across specific disorders. Gender or education did not explain the association of psychiatric disorders with participation. Conclusions: Owing to non-participation, the true prevalence

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据