4.1 Article

Challenges in managing elderly people with diabetes in primary care settings in Norway

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 241-247

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2013.854445

关键词

Chronic illness; diabetes; elderly people; focus groups; general practice; home-based services; Norway; nursing homes; qualitative research

资金

  1. Bergen University College
  2. Western Norway Regional Health Authority (Fund for Patient Safety and Quality Improvement)
  3. Diabetes Research Foundation of Western Norway
  4. Norwegian Diabetes Association, southern Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To explore the experiences and clinical challenges that nurses and nursing assistants face when providing high-quality diabetes-specific management and care for elderly people with diabetes in primary care settings. Design. Focus-group interviews. Subjects and setting. Sixteen health care professionals: 12 registered nurses and four nursing assistants from nursing homes (10), district nursing service (5), and a service unit (1) were recruited by municipal managers who had local knowledge and knew the workforce. All the participants were women aged 32-59 years with clinical experience ranging from 1.5 to 38 years. Results. Content analysis revealed a discrepancy between the level of expertise which the participants described as important to delivering high-quality care and their capacity to deliver such care. The discrepancy was due to lack of availability and access to current information, limited ongoing support, lack of cohesion among health care professionals, and limited confidence and autonomy. Challenges to delivering high-quality care included complex, difficult patient situations and lack of confidence to make decisions founded on evidence-based guidelines. Conclusion. Participants lacked confidence and autonomy to manage elderly people with diabetes in municipal care settings. Lack of information, support, and professional cohesion made the role challenging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据