4.2 Article

A cross-diagnostic validation of an instrument measuring participation in everyday occupations: The Occupational Gaps Questionnaire (OGQ)

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2012.749944

关键词

assessment; construct validity; occupational therapy; Rasch analysis; rehabilitation

资金

  1. Health Care Sciences Postgraduate School at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. Swedish Brain Foundation
  3. Swedish Stroke Association
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Welfare
  6. Stockholm County Council
  7. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  8. Uppsala County Council
  9. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  10. Swedish Association of Occupational Therapists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to validate the Occupational Gaps Questionnaire (OGQ) when used in samples of people with acquired brain injuries (ABI), stroke, stress-related disorders, concussion, and persons receiving rehabilitation after ABI to investigate whether the OGQ could be used as a generic scale. A total of 601 individuals answered the OGQ at various time points after illness/injury. A Rasch analysis was performed on the data to evaluate evidence of internal scale validity and person response validity, and the capability of the OGQ to separate people into different levels of participation in everyday occupations. The results provided evidence that the OGQ is a valid measure across different diagnostic groups. A generic version of the OGQ can separate at least two levels of perceived occupational gaps and is therefore recommended as a screening tool to be used by occupational therapists working with different diagnostic groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据