4.2 Review

Primary Immunodeficiency and Autoimmunity: Lessons From Human Diseases

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 317-328

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2010.02386.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) are a genetically heterogenous group of > 150 disorders that affect distinct components of the innate and adaptive immune system and are often associated with autoimmune diseases. We describe PID affecting T-regulatory cells, complement and B cells or their products and discuss the possibility of a cause-effect relationship. The high concordance of T-regulatory cell defects to organ-specific autoimmune disease implies an obligatory role of these cells in maintaining tolerance to epithelial and endocrine tissues; the absence of central nervous system involvement may reflect immunological privilege. Congenital defects in C1q, C1r/s and C4 are strongly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and this pattern along with laboratory evidence suggests a major importance of classical pathway activity in safe elimination of immune complexes and prevention of immune complex disease (ICD). It is debatable whether this ICD is to be regarded as an autoimmune disease (resulting from a breakdown of immunological ignorance to antigens that are normally hidden), as autoantibodies may be absent, and tissue damage because of deposition of immune complexes could account for all of the pathology observed. Evidence for a causative link between primary antibody deficiencies and autoimmune disease is much less compelling and may in fact involve a common genetic background. However, arguments have also been made in favour of the notion that an intense antigen load as a result of recurrent or persistent infections may affect either tolerance or ignorance, e.g. by molecular mimicry or the presence of superantigens. Similar immunological mechanisms might account for the vast majority of autoimmune diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据