4.2 Article

Toll-Like Receptor Expression and Function in Subsets of Human γδ T Lymphocytes

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 245-255

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02290.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ka502/8-3, SFB 415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two subsets of human gamma delta T cells can be identified by T cell receptor (TCR) V gene usage. V delta 2V gamma 9 T cells dominate in peripheral blood and recognize microbe- or tumour-derived phosphoantigens. V delta 1 T cells are abundant in mucosal tissue and recognize stress-induced MHC-related molecules. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are known to co-stimulate interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production in peripheral blood gamma delta T cells and in V delta 2V gamma 9 T cell lines. By microarray analysis, we have identified a range of genes differentially regulated in freshly isolated gamma delta T cells by TCR versus TCR plus TLR3 stimulation. Furthermore, we have investigated TLR expression in freshly isolated V delta 1 and V delta 2 subsets and cytokine/chemokine production in response to TLR1/2/6, 3 and 5 ligands. TLR1,2,6,7 RNA was abundantly expressed in both subsets, whereas TLR3 RNA was present at low levels, and TLR5 and 8 RNA only marginally in both subsets. Despite abundant RNA expression, TLR1 was rarely detectable by flow cytometry. In contrast, TLR2 and TLR6 proteins were detected in purified V delta 1 and V delta 2 T cells, and TLR3 protein was detected intracellularly in both subsets. TLR1/2/6, 3 and 5 ligands co-stimulated the IFN-gamma and chemokine secretion in TCR-activated V delta 1 and V delta 2 subsets, although the levels of IFN-gamma secreted by V delta 1 T cells were much lower than those produced by V delta 2 T cells. Our results reveal comparable expression of TLRs and functional responses to TLR ligands in freshly isolated V delta 1 and V delta 2 T cells and underscore the intrinsically different capacity for IFN-gamma secretion of V delta 1 versus V delta 2 T cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据