4.6 Article

A bonding evolution theory study of the mechanism of [3+2] cycloaddition reactions of nitrones with electron-deficient ethylenes

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 72, 页码 58464-58477

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra10458k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of the Spanish Government [CTQ2013-45646-P]
  2. FONDECYT [1140341]
  3. Millennium Nucleus of Chemical Processes and Catalysis (CPC) [NC 120082]
  4. European Social Fund [BES-2014-068258]
  5. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  6. [DI-UNAB-793-15/R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism of zw-type [3+2] cycloaddition (32CA) reactions of nitrones with electron-deficient (ED) ethylenes has been studied using density functional theory (DFT) methods at the MPWB1K/6-31G(d) level of theory. An exploration of the potential energy surfaces associated with the four competitive reactive channels of the 32CA reaction between C-phenyl-N-methyl nitrone and acrolein indicates that the cycloaddition reaction takes place through a one-step mechanism. This cycloaddition reaction presents a moderate meta regioselectivity and a complete endo stereoselectivity, which is diminished in dichloromethane. Analysis of the DFT reactivity indices of the reagents allows an explanation of the participation of nucleophilic nitrones in zw-type 32CA reactions towards ED ethylenes. A bonding evolution theory (BET) study of the two endo regioisomeric reactive channels allows establishing the molecular mechanism of these relevant 32CA reactions. Both regioisomeric channels topologically take place along eight differentiated phases. While the formation of the C-C single bond follows Domingo's recently proposed model, the formation of the C-C single bond takes place at the short distance of 1.6 angstrom through the donation of some electron density of the oxygen lone pairs of the nitrone to the beta-conjugated carbon atom of acrolein. BET supports the non-concerted nature of these zw-type 32CA reactions and makes it possible to reject the pericyclic mechanism proposed for them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据