4.3 Article

Adalimumab treatment in Crohn's disease does not induce early changes in regulatory T cells

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 46, 期 10, 页码 1206-1214

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2011.603157

关键词

Adalimumab; Crohn's disease; FOXP3 protein; regulatory T lymphocytes

资金

  1. Abbott Pharmaceuticals
  2. Danish Colitis-Crohn Foundation
  3. Beckett Foundation
  4. Karen Elise Jensen Foundation
  5. Desiree and Niels Ydes Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Anti-TNF-alpha antibodies has been suggested to modulate regulatory T cell (Treg) percentages in rheumatoid arthritis, but results from studies of Crohn's disease (CD) are conflicting. We investigated dynamic changes of circulating Tregs in CD during treatment with the anti-TNF-alpha-antibody adalimumab (Humira (R), Abbott Laboratories A/S, Emdrupvej 28C, DK-2100 Copenhagen). Material and methods. Blood samples from 26 CD patients were analysed using flow cytometry before and 1 and 26 weeks after initiation of adalimumab treatment to determine the percentage of Tregs among CD4+ T cells. Results. In spite of a significant decline in disease activity scores and biochemical markers of inflammation, during the first week of treatment, we did not observe early modulating effects of adalimumab on Treg percentages. However, we found a long-term increase in Treg percentages in responders who had low Treg percentages (< 5%) at baseline (p = 0.04). Treg percentage was inversely associated with disease activity (CD activity index or CDAI) (Spearman's rank correlation, rho = -0.47, p = 0.02). High Treg percentages among CD4+ T cells at baseline predicted clinical response to adalimumab. Conclusions. Adalimumab treatment did not induce early modulatory effects on Treg percentage, even in responders. This finding suggests that adalimumab does not have a direct or selective effect on Tregs. However, Treg percentage was associated with disease activity and high Treg percentage predicted response to adalimumab.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据