4.1 Article

Acute hormonal changes following intravenous glucose challenge in lean and obese human subjects

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365511003792975

关键词

Glucose; insulin; obesity; satiety; hormones

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [104334]
  2. Turku University Central Hospital (EVO)
  3. Turku University Foundation
  4. Research Foundation of Orion Corporation
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [104334, 104334] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To study the effects of rapid i.v. glucose bolus on insulin, leptin, ghrelin, peptide YY (PYY), free fatty acids (FFA), glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) concentrations together with self-reported satiety ratings in lean and obese human subjects. Methods. Twenty-five healthy subjects were recruited, 12 were lean (mean age = 26 years, BMI range = 19.8-23.9 kg/m(2)) and 13 were obese (mean age = 27 years, BMI range = 27.7-42.2 kg/m(2)). In two separate 55 min counter-balanced blinded sessions (separate days), subjects were administered an i.v. dose of 300 mg/kg glucose or saline. Blood concentrations of several feeding-related hormones were recorded at multiple time points, together with ratings of satiety and euphoria. Results. Greater increases in glucose concentrations were observed in the obese group compared to the lean group (p < 0.0001). In both lean and obese subjects, glucose injection induced a clear fall in the concentrations of FFA, ghrelin, glucagon and PYY (p < 0.0001) but not in the concentrations of leptin or GLP-1. Obese subjects showed positive correlations between satiety and glucose, but only at time points 30 min (r = 0.73, p = 0.005) and 55 min (r = 0.82, p = 0.0005). Conclusions. The directions and the magnitudes of short-term hormonal changes after i.v. glucose challenge are the same in lean and moderately obese subjects. Possible short-term regulatory effects of leptin and GLP-1 can not be induced by acute energy load bypassing the GI-tract.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据