4.3 Article

Combined 2D and 3D-QSAR, molecular modelling and docking studies of pyrazolodiazepinones as novel phosphodiesterase 2 inhibitors

期刊

SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 905-937

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2014.969309

关键词

3D-QSAR; PDE2; HQSAR; pyrazolodiazepinone; docking

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, New Delhi [08/281(0025)/2013-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective inhibition of phosphodiesterase 2 (PDE2) in cells where it is located elevates cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and acts as novel analgesic with antinociceptive activity. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies for pyrazolodiazepinone inhibitors exhibiting PDE2 inhibition were performed using comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) and Topomer CoMFA, and two-dimensional QSAR study was performed using a Hologram QSAR (HQSAR) method. QSAR models were generated using training set of 23 compounds and were validated using test set of nine compounds. The optimum partial least squares (PLS) for CoMFA-Focusing, CoMSIA-SDH, Topomer CoMFA and HQSAR models exhibited good 'leave-one-out' cross validated correlation coefficient (q(2)) of 0.790, 0.769, 0.840 and 0.787, coefficient of determination (r(2)) of 0.999, 0.964, 0.979 and 0.980, and high predictive power (r(pred)(2)) of 0.796, 0.833, 0.820 and 0.803 respectively. Docking studies revealed that those inhibitors able to bind to amino acid Gln859 by cGMP binding orientation called 'glutamine-switch', and also bind to the hydrophobic clamp of PDE2 isoform, could possess high selectivity for PDE2. From the results of all the studies, structure-activity relationships and structural requirements for binding to active site of PDE2 were established which provide useful guidance for the design and future synthesis of potent PDE2 inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据