4.7 Article

QRAM a Qualitative Occupational Safety Risk Assessment Model for the construction industry that incorporate uncertainties by the use of fuzzy sets

期刊

SAFETY SCIENCE
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 57-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.019

关键词

Qualitative risk assessment; Construction industry; Occupational safety; Fuzzy sets; Qualitative model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Occupational safety risk assessment is the core of safety practices. Is a complex process that requires the consideration of sundry parameters, which are often difficult to quantify. This paper presents the new developed fuzzy QRAM model, which intends to support construction companies in carrying out their responsibilities to reduce occupational safety risks. The innovative aspects of QRAM model is to embody assess of the safety climate and the safety barriers effectiveness as assessment dimensions and the use of fuzzy sets theory to enhance the use of imprecise and incomplete information, elicited by linguistic variables. The QRAM model was designed based on the best academic and empirical knowledge about safety risks on construction industry, biomechanical data and laws of physics, chemistry and engineering. The lack of credible and accurate data, resulting from the in-depth investigation of work accidents in construction industry was the greatest difficulty in carry-out this work. QRAM was, firstly evaluated by peer review, with 12 safety experts from Brazil (2), Bulgaria (1), Greece (3), Turkey (3) and Portugal (3) and, then, appraised by comparing QRAM with 2 other occupational safety risk assessment techniques. The safety experts evaluators concluded that: (a) QRAM is a versatile tool to assess occupational safety risk assessment on construction sites; (b) the specific checklists for knowledge elicitation are a good aid and enhance the process objectivity, and (c) the use of linguistic variables is a better way to rate the risk factors thus to render the risk assessment process more objective and reliable. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据