4.7 Article

Patterns of pedestrian attitudes, perceptions and behaviour in Europe

期刊

SAFETY SCIENCE
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 114-122

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.09.008

关键词

Pedestrians; Attitudes; Behaviour; Principal component analysis; Cluster analysis

资金

  1. European Commission [TREN/09/SUB/E3/229/SI2.544555/SARTRE 4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to identify patterns of pedestrian attitudes, perceptions and behaviour in Europe, on the basis of the results of the SARTRE 4 (Social Attitudes to Road Traffic Risk in Europe) pan-European survey carried out in late 2010 and early 2011 (questionnaire-based personal interviews in 19 European countries involving 4290 pedestrians). The various components of pedestrian attitudes and behaviour (e.g. acceptance of measures and penalties, risk-taking behaviour, perceived level of service, etc.) were determined by means of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on 33 variables contained in the survey. Moreover, groups of pedestrians with similar attitudinal and behavioural characteristics were identified by means of a Two Step Cluster Analysis. The results revealed eight components, from which six are associated with pedestrian attitudes and two with pedestrian behaviour and were further analysed for different countries and different age and gender groups. Furthermore, the cluster analysis revealed three types of pedestrians. The first type concerns pedestrians with 'positive behaviour and positive attitudes'. The second type concerns pedestrians with 'negative behaviour and negative attitudes', a group into which male and young pedestrians are over-represented. The third type concerns neutral pedestrians with 'positive behaviour but mixed attitudes', a group that presents the largest dispersion between countries and whose proportion defines the dominant type of pedestrian in each country. However, the proportion of the different types of pedestrians in each country does not appear to be associated with pedestrian fatality rates. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据