4.6 Article

Effects of terminal group and chain length on temperature-responsive chromatography utilizing poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) synthesized via RAFT polymerization

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 89, 页码 73217-73224

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra15906g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [25293009]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25293009] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) with two chain lengths (MW: ca. 5000, and ca. 20 000 g mol(-1)) was synthesized by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, using 2-dodecylsulfanylthiocarbonylsulfanyl-2-methyl propionic acid as the chain transfer agent. The derivatization of terminal dodecyl groups to maleimide groups was performed through the reduction of terminal trithiocarbonate moieties. These polymers were grafted onto aminopropyl silica using an activated ester-amine coupling method. Five types of polymer modified silica beads were prepared, i.e., long chain length, short chain length, and mixed chain length functionalized with a dodecyl terminal group, and long chain length and short chain length with a maleimide terminal group. The surface properties of the modified polymer silica beads were evaluated by employing them as the stationary phase in HPLC setups and examining the temperature-dependent elution profiles of five steroids. The retention factor of steroids became smaller when the terminal dodecyl group was substituted with a maleimide group. A hydrophobic dodecyl moiety on the outermost surface strongly affected the retention of steroids, and the retention factor of steroids on short chains was larger than that on long chains below the lower critical solution temperature. These results indicate that the chain length and terminal functional group on the outermost surface of the polymer have a critical effect on the characteristics of polymer modified silica bead interfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据