4.6 Article

Energy-limited escape revised The transition from strong planetary winds to stable thermospheres

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 585, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527042

关键词

methods: numerical; hydrodynamics; radiation mechanisms: general; planets and satellites: atmospheres; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability

资金

  1. Verbundforschung [50OR 1105]
  2. German National Science Foundation (DFG) within the Research Training College [1351]
  3. DLR [50 OR 1307]
  4. ESA research fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas planets in close proximity to their host stars experience photoevaporative mass loss. The energy-limited escape concept is generally used to derive estimates for the planetary mass-loss rates. Our photoionization hydrodynamics simulations of the thermospheres of hot gas planets show that the energy-limited escape concept is valid only for planets with a gravitational potential lower than log10 (-Phi(G)) < 13.11 erg g(-1) because in these planets the radiative energy input is efficiently used to drive the planetary wind. Massive and compact planets with log10 (-Phi(G)) greater than or similar to 13.6 erg g(-1) exhibit more tightly bound atmospheres in which the complete radiative energy input is re-emitted through hydrogen Ly alpha and free-free emission. These planets therefore host hydrodynamically stable thermospheres. Between these two extremes the strength of the planetary winds rapidly declines as a result of a decreasing heating efficiency. Small planets undergo enhanced evaporation because they host expanded atmospheres that expose a larger surface to the stellar irradiation. We present scaling laws for the heating efficiency and the expansion radius that depend on the gravitational potential and irradiation level of the planet. The resulting revised energy-limited escape concept can be used to derive estimates for the mass-loss rates of super-Earth-sized planets as well as massive hot Jupiters with hydrogen-dominated atmospheres.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据