4.6 Article

Enhanced electrochemical oxidation of phenol using a hydrophobic TiO2-NTs/SnO2-Sb-PTFE electrode prepared by pulse electrodeposition

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 41, 页码 32245-32255

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra01013f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nanyang Technological University (NTU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, novel Sb-doped SnO2 electrodes with a polyetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) composite were fabricated by pulse electrodeposition. In this process, vertically aligned TiO2 nanotubes (TiO2-NTs) formed by anodization of Ti plates served as the substrate for SnO2 eletrodeposition. Comparing with the conventional SnO2-Sb electrodes, TiO2-NTs/SnO2-Sb-PTFE electrodes have higher oxygen evolution potential, improved surface hydrophobicity, superior hydroxyl radical (HO center dot) generation and enhanced electrocatalytic activity by incorporation of PTFE nanoparticles. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) shows that the surfaces of the PTFE composite electrodes exhibit a microspherical structure. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) confirms the uniform distribution of Sn, Sb, F and C on TiO2-NTs/SnO2-Sb-PTFE surfaces. More importantly, the electrodes exhibit a distinctive improvement of oxygen evolution potential (OEP) from 2.0 to 2.4 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). The electrochemical impedance of TiO2-NTs/SnO2-Sb-PTFE also decreases significantly compared with Ti/SnO2-Sb(conventional). The electrocatalytic performance of TiO2-NTs/SnO2-Sb-PTFE compared with Ti/SnO2-Sb(conventional) and TiO2-NTs/SnO2-Sb were investigated using phenol as the model pollutant. The effects of initial solution pH and types of supporting electrolyte were investigated. The removal efficiency of total organic carbon (TOC), specific UV absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA(254)), mineralization current efficiency (MCE) and energy consumption (Ec) with respect to different PTFE loadings on the electrodes were investigated. The anodic leaching of Sn ions was also studied under different conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据