4.1 Article

Study of pH correction process of chloride-bicarbonate dilute solutions by electrodialysis with bipolar membranes

期刊

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 767-772

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S1023193512070130

关键词

electrodialysis; pH correction of a chloride-hydrocarbonate solution; bipolar membrane; carbonic acid equilibrium; chemical reaction; outer diffusion kinetics; water dissociation; mathematical model

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [11-01-96512-r_yug_ts, 11-03-96504-r_yug_ts]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pH of a dilute chloride-hydrocarbonate solution and the concentrations of chloride ions and carbonic acid anions at the outlet of the alkaline and acid chambers of the electrodialysis cell formed by bipolar and anion-exchange membranes were determined. The decrease in the concentration of hydrocarbonate ions in the alkaline chamber with growth of current density was not equal to its increase in the acid chamber. This disbalance was caused by two concurrent processes: the electromigration ion transport through the anion-exchange membrane and the chemical reactions of hydrocarbonate ions with the water dissociation products formed on the bipolar and anion-exchange membranes. A mathematical model was suggested to describe the electrodialysis correction of the pH of a dilute chloride-hydrocarbonate solution. The experimental data on the correction of pH of the chloride-hydrocarbonate solution were well approximated by both the model that takes into account water dissociation on the anion-exchange membrane and the simplified model that neglects water dissociation. The experimental data agreed well with the results of calculations by the model in which the effective anion transport numbers were calculated only from ion concentrations and diffusion coefficients in solution. This reflects the outer diffusion character of the kinetics of ion transport through the anion-exchange membrane, with pH of dilute solutions corrected by electrodialysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据