4.6 Article

Neutral chlorine and molecular hydrogen at high redshift

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 575, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425553

关键词

cosmology: observations; ISM: clouds; quasars: absorption lines

资金

  1. RF President Program [MK-4861.2013.2]
  2. Leading Scientific Schools of Russian Federation [NSh-294.2014.2]
  3. Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research (Centre Franco-Indien pour la Promotion de la Recherche Avancee) [4304-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlorine and molecular hydrogen are known to be tightly linked together in the cold phase of the local interstellar medium through rapid chemical reactions. We present here the first systematic study of this relation at high redshifts using H-2-bearing damped Ly alpha systems (DLAs) detected along quasar lines of sight. Using high-resolution spectroscopic data from VLT/UVES and Keck/HIRES, we report the detection of ClI in 9 DLAs (including five new detections) out of 18 high-z DLAs with N(H-2) >= 10(17.3) cm(-2) (including a new H-2 detection at z = 3.09145 towards J 2100-0641) and present upper limits for the remaining 9 systems. We find a similar to 5 sigma correlation between N(ClI) and N(H-2) with only similar to 0.2 dex dispersion over the range 18.1 < log N(H-2) < 20.1, thus probing column densities 10 times lower than those seen towards nearby stars, roughly following the relation N(ClI) approximate to 1.5 x 10(-6) x N(H-2). This relation between column densities is surprisingly the same at low and high redshift suggesting that the physical and chemical conditions are similar for a given H-2 (or ClI) column density. In turn, the N(ClI)/N(H-2) ratio is found to be uncorrelated with the overall metallicity in the DLA. Our results confirm that neutral chlorine is an excellent tracer of molecule-rich gas and show that the molecular fraction and/or metallicity in the H-2-bearing component of DLA could possibly be much higher than the line-of-sight average values usually measured in DLAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据