4.6 Article

WASP-20b and WASP-28b: a hot Saturn and a hot Jupiter in near-aligned orbits around solar-type stars

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 575, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423591

关键词

planetary systems; stars: individual: WASP-20b; stars: individual: WASP-28b

资金

  1. UK's Science and Technology Facilities Council
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [PBGEP2-145594]
  3. STFC [ST/I000666/1, ST/I001719/1, ST/J00152X/1, ST/L000733/1, ST/J001651/1, ST/K006126/1, ST/G001006/1, ST/L00139X/1, PP/D000890/1, ST/M001296/1, PP/F000065/1, ST/J000027/1, PP/F000073/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J00152X/1, PP/F000065/1, ST/M001296/1, ST/L00139X/1, ST/I000666/1, ST/K006126/1, ST/G001006/1, ST/I001719/1, ST/L000733/1, ST/J000027/1, PP/D000890/1, ST/J001651/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PBGEP2_145594] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the discovery of the planets WASP-20b and WASP-28b along with measurements of their sky-projected orbital obliquities. WASP-20b is an inflated, Saturn-mass planet (0.31 M-Jup; 1.46 R-Jup) in a 4.9-day, near-aligned (lambda = 12.7 +/- 4.2.) orbit around CD-24 102 (V = 10.7; F9). Due to the low density of the planet and the apparent brightness of the host star, WASP-20 is a good target for atmospheric characterisation via transmission spectroscopy. WASP-28b is an inflated, Jupiter-mass planet (0.91 M-Jup; 1.21 R-Jup) in a 3.4-day, near-aligned (lambda = 8 +/- 18 degrees) orbit around a V = 12, F8 star. As intermediate-mass planets in short orbits around aged, cool stars (7(-1)(+2) Gyr and 6000 +/- 100 K for WASP-20; 5(-2)(+3) Gyr and 6100 +/- 150 K for WASP-28), their orbital alignment is consistent with the hypothesis that close-in giant planets are scattered into eccentric orbits with random alignments, which are then circularised and aligned with their stars' spins via tidal dissipation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据