4.6 Article

Pushing the limits for enzyme-based membrane-less hydrogen fuel cells - achieving useful power and stability

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 3649-3656

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra13565b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Supergen V) [EP/H019480/1]
  2. Biological and Biotechnological Research Councils [BB/H003878-1, BB/I022309-1, BB/L009722/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/H003878/1, BB/I022309/1, BB/L009722/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. EPSRC [EP/H019480/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H003878/1, BB/I022309/1, BB/L009722/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H019480/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance characteristics of simple enzyme-based membrane-less hydrogen fuel cells running on non-explosive H-2-rich air mixtures have been established using an adjustable test bed that allows multiple unit cells to operate in series or parallel. Recent advances with '3D' electrodes constructed from compacted porous carbon loaded with hydrogenase (anode) and bilirubin oxidase (cathode) have been extended in order to scale up fuel cell power to useful levels. One result is an appealing 'classroom' demonstration of a model house containing small electronic devices powered by H-2 mixed with a small amount of air. The 3D electrodes work by greatly increasing catalyst loading (at both the anode and cathode) and selectively restricting the access of O-2 (relative to H-2) to enzymes embedded in pores at the anode. The latter property raises the possibility of using standard hydrogenases that are not O-2-tolerant: however, experiments with such an enzyme reveal good short-term performance due to restricted O-2 access, but low long-term stability because the root cause of O-2 sensitivity has not been addressed. Hydrogenases that are truly O-2 tolerant must therefore remain the major focus of any future enzyme-based hydrogen fuel cell technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据