4.6 Article

Calibrating echelle spectrographs with Fabry-Perot etalons

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 581, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526462

关键词

instrumentation: interferometers; instrumentation: spectrographs; methods: data analysis; techniques: radial velocities

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG GrK 1351]
  2. European Research Council [279347]
  3. Heisenberg professorship [DFG RE-1664/9-2]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [279347] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Over the past decades hollow-cathode lamps have been calibration standards for spectroscopic measurements. Advancing to cm/s radial velocity precisions with the next generation of instruments requires more suitable calibration sources with more lines and fewer dynamic range problems. Fabry-Perot interferometers provide a regular and dense grid of lines and homogeneous amplitudes, which makes them good candidates for next-generation calibrators. Aims. We investigate the usefulness of Fabry-Perot etalons in wavelength calibration, present an algorithm to incorporate the etalon spectrum in the wavelength solution, and examine potential problems. Methods. The quasi-periodic pattern of Fabry-Perot lines was used along with a hollow-cathode lamp to anchor the numerous spectral features on an absolute scale. We tested our method with the HARPS spectrograph and compared our wavelength solution to the one derived from a laser frequency comb. Results. The combined hollow-cathode lamp/etalon calibration overcomes large distortion (50 m/s) in the wavelength solution of the HARPS data reduction software. The direct comparison to the laser frequency comb shows differences of only 10 m/s at most. Conclusions. Combining hollow-cathode lamps with Fabry-Perot interferometers can lead to substantial improvements in the wavelength calibration of echelle spectrographs. Etalons can provide economical alternatives to the laser frequency comb, especially for smaller projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据