4.4 Article

RNA-Puzzles: A CASP-like evaluation of RNA three-dimensional structure prediction

期刊

RNA
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 610-625

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.031054.111

关键词

3D prediction; bioinformatics; force fields; structure

资金

  1. Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian, Siemens SA
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/33528/2008]
  3. National Institutes of Health [AI72012, CA132753]
  4. Polish Ministry of Science [HISZPANIA/152/2006, PBZ/MNiSW/07/2006]
  5. EU [LSHG-CT-2005-518238, POIG.02.03.00-00-003/09]
  6. Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University [PBWB-03/2009]
  7. German Academic Exchange Service [D/09/42768]
  8. NIH [GM063732, R01-GM073179, U01-AI061192, R44 GM85889, R44 GM095251]
  9. NSF [MCB0920067, MCB0920411]
  10. U.S. National Institutes of Health [GM064803, GM088813]
  11. Fonds Quebecois de Recherche: Nature et Technologies
  12. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP93679]
  13. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  14. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 23497] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/33528/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the results of a first, collective, blind experiment in RNA three-dimensional (3D) structure prediction, encompassing three prediction puzzles. The goals are to assess the leading edge of RNA structure prediction techniques; compare existing methods and tools; and evaluate their relative strengths, weaknesses, and limitations in terms of sequence length and structural complexity. The results should give potential users insight into the suitability of available methods for different applications and facilitate efforts in the RNA structure prediction community in ongoing efforts to improve prediction tools. We also report the creation of an automated evaluation pipeline to facilitate the analysis of future RNA structure prediction exercises.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据