4.4 Article

Sliced microRNA targets and precise loop-first processing of MIR319 hairpins revealed by analysis of the Physcomitrella patens degradome

期刊

RNA
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 2112-2121

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.1774909

关键词

microRNA; uncapped mRNAs; plants; Physcomitrella; genomics; second-generation sequencing

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [0718051]
  2. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. Department of Energy [FG02-84ER13179]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0718051] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC)
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [821527] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expression profiling of the 59 ends of uncapped mRNAs (degradome'' sequencing) can be used to empirically catalog microRNA (miRNA) targets, to probe patterns of miRNA hairpin processing, to examine mRNA decay, and to analyze accumulation of endogenous short interfering RNA (siRNA) precursors. We sequenced and analyzed the degradome of the moss Physcomitrella patens, an important model system for functional genomic analyses in plant evolution. A total of 52 target mRNAs of 27 different Physcomitrella miRNA families were identified. Many targets of both more conserved and less conserved miRNA families encoded putative regulatory proteins. Remnants of MIRNA hairpin processing also populated the degradome data and indicated an unusual loop-first'' mode of precise processing for the MIR319 gene family. Precise loop-first processing was confirmed for native Physcomitrella, rice, and Arabidopsis MIR319 hairpins, as well as an Arabidopsis artificial MIRNA (aMIRNA) based upon a MIR319 backbone. MIR319 is thus a conserved exception to the general rule of loop-last processing of MIRNA hairpins. Loop-first MIR319 processing may contribute to the high efficacy of a widely used MIR319-based strategy for aMIRNA production in plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据