4.5 Review

Repair of pre-mRNA splicing Prospects for a therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy

期刊

RNA BIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 430-440

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/rna.7.4.12206

关键词

Antisense oligonucleotides; bifunctional RNA; exon definition; gene therapy; motoneurons; splicing enhancer; U7snRNA

资金

  1. AFM (Association Francaise contre les Myopathies)
  2. EURASNET (European Network of Excellence on Alternative Splicing)
  3. Swiss Foundation for Research on Muscle Diseases
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0-120064]
  5. Kanton Bern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent analyses of complete genomes have revealed that alternative splicing became more prevalent and important during eukaryotic evolution. Alternative splicing augments the protein repertoire-particularly that of the human genome- and plays an important role in the development and function of differentiated cell types. However, splicing is also extremely vulnerable, and defects in the proper recognition of splicing signals can give rise to a variety of diseases. In this review, we discuss splicing correction therapies, by using the inherited disease Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) as an example. This lethal early childhood disorder is caused by deletions or other severe mutations of SMN1, a gene coding for the essential survival of motoneurons protein. A second gene copy present in humans and few non-human primates, SMN2, can only partly compensate for the defect because of a single nucleotide change in exon 7 that causes this exon to be skipped in the majority of mRNAs. Thus SMN2 is a prime therapeutic target for SMA. In recent years, several strategies based on small molecule drugs, antisense oligonucleotides or in vivo expressed RNAs have been developed that allow a correction of SMN2 splicing. For some of these, a therapeutic benefit has been demonstrated in mouse models for SMA. This means that clinical trials of such splicing therapies for SMA may become possible in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据