4.3 Article

HYDROLOGIC ALTERATIONS IN THE WABASH RIVER WATERSHED, USA

期刊

RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 1175-1184

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1155

关键词

hydrologic alteration; Wabash River; reservoir effect; agriculture effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flow alteration of streams from anthropogenic impacts is ubiquitous worldwide. In this paper, we examine flow alteration in a single watershed, the Wabash River and suggest potential impacts on aquatic assemblages. The indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) software was used to evaluate hydrological variables generated from daily discharge data of 80 USGS gauging stations, during the past several decades. We used the approach of regressions of hydrological variables against time to identify hydrologic change. An average of 6.9 hydrologic variables (of 33 variables) were significantly altered at each station, and stations with larger watersheds had an increased number of altered variables. A principal components (PC) analysis of altered hydrologic variables resulted in three of four PC axes that were correlated with watershed area. Significant results were: 1) larger steams were more likely to have hydrologic alteration than smaller streams: (2) streams with upstream darns had increased minimum flows for 1-, 3-, 7- and 30-day intervals, decreased maximum flows for 1-, 3-, 7- and 30-day intervals. increased fall rates, decreased summer monthly flows and decreased high pulse counts; (3) the presence of agriculture in upstream watersheds resulted in all increased number of zero flow clays, increased low Pulse Counts and decreased high flows during October and April. No significant differences were detected in hydrologic alteration based on urban land-use of upstream watersheds. Hydrologic alterations in the Wabash River watershed have undoubtedly resulted in ecological degradation. We suggest that changes in assemblages during the past century are linked to these hydrologic alterations. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据