4.6 Article

Addressing Challenges to Building Resilience Through Interdisciplinary Research and Engagement

期刊

RISK ANALYSIS
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 1248-1253

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/risa.13202

关键词

Adaptive capacity; interdisciplinary science; natural hazards; resilience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resilient communities are those less impacted by natural disasters and possess the ability to recover quickly. Building resilience involves accurately assessing hazards, understanding vulnerabilities, and engaging the community in proactive planning, while also collaborating across disciplines and incorporating data from different fields.
Resilient communities are less affected by, and recover faster from, natural disasters. To be resilient in rapidly changing contemporary environments subject to the effects of complex factors such as climate change and urbanization, communities must effectively and efficiently adapt to new conditions to minimize future risks. To develop resilience, the hazards to which the community is exposed and vulnerable (i.e., future hurricanes, subsidence, salt water intrusion) must be accurately assessed, the systems (i.e., natural, built, and social) must be well understood, and the community must be engaged in the proactive planning and priority setting process. An approach to building resilience that utilizes the adaptive capacity of planning highlights opportunities to work collaboratively across disciplines to incorporate models and data from different disciplines to reduce uncertainty. We present one interdisciplinary group's approach to addressing challenges to building resilience through proactive planning, including: (1) characterizing hazards more accurately; (2) improving understanding of the vulnerability of natural (e.g., climate and infrastructure) systems subject to hazards; and (3) capturing potential synergies from interactions between planning and policies that govern decisions about the design of human settlements in hazardous areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据