4.6 Article

Uses and Misuses of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in Environmental Decision Making

期刊

RISK ANALYSIS
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 26-33

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01130.x

关键词

Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); environmental decisions; multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA); weighted average

资金

  1. Robust Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Working Group
  2. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis (ACERA)
  3. ESRC [ES/G021694/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G021694/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We focus on a class of multicriteria methods that are commonly used in environmental decision making-those that employ the weighted linear average algorithm (and this includes the popular analytic hierarchy process (AHP)). While we do not doubt the potential benefits of using formal decision methods of this type, we draw attention to the consequences of not using them well. In particular, we highlight a property of these methods that should not be overlooked when they are applied in environmental and wider decision-making contexts: the final decision or ranking of options is dependent on the choice of performance scoring scales for the criteria when the criteria weights are held constant. We compare this sensitivity to a well-known criticism of the AHP, and we go on to describe the more general lesson when it comes to using weighted linear average methods-a lesson concerning the relationship between criteria weights and performance scoring scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据