4.4 Article

Anti-MDA5 antibody is associated with A/SIP and decreased T cells in peripheral blood and predicts poor prognosis of ILD in Chinese patients with dermatomyositis

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 3909-3915

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-011-2323-y

关键词

Myositis; Acute/subacute interstitial pneumonia; Anti-MDA5 antibody; Lymphocyte subgroup

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81072457]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [D101100050010018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to determine serum anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 prevalence and their clinical associations in Chinese patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis (PM/DM). Serum anti-MDA5 antibody was detected by ELISA in 113 adult PM/DM patients and in various controls. Flow cytometry was applied to analyze the subgroups of lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of PM/DM patients. The serum anti-MDA5-positive rate in the DM patients (22.6%) was significantly higher compared with that in PM patients (0%, P < 0.005), patients with SLE (3.3%, P < 0.05), RA (3.3%, P < 0.05), pSS (0%, P < 0.05), pulmonary infection (0%, P < 0.05) and healthy controls (0%, P < 0.001). The percentage of decreased CD4(+), CD8(+) T cell counts, raised CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio in peripheral blood and the incidence of acute/subacute interstitial pneumonia (A/SIP) were significantly higher in anti-MDA5-positive DM group than negative group (all P < 0.05). Additionally, logistic multivariate analysis showed that anti-MDA5 is an independent risk factor for death of ILD in DM (OR = 8.46, 95% CI 1.77-40.36, P = 0.007). In conclusion, in Chinese PM/DM patients, serum anti-MDA5 antibody is mainly presented in DM patients and can be a useful marker for A/SIP in patients with DM. It can predict unfavorable prognosis in DM patients with ILD. Further studies are needed to identify how the abnormal T cells in peripheral blood participated in the generation of the anti-MDA5 antibody.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据