4.3 Article

Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and prevalence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in chordoma

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 13, 页码 11139-11149

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3576

关键词

PD-L1; TILs; chordoma; immunotherapy

资金

  1. Stephan L. Harris Fund
  2. Gattegno and Wechsler funds
  3. Jennifer Hunter Yates Foundation
  4. Chordoma Foundation
  5. Sarcoma Foundation of America (SFA)
  6. National Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Institutes of Health (NIH), UO1 [CA151452-01]
  7. Sarcoma SPORE/NIH
  8. Academic Enrichment Fund of MGH Orthopedic Surgery
  9. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81101375]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chordomas are primary malignant tumors of the notochord that are resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), prevalence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and their clinical relevance in chordoma remain unknown. We evaluated PD-L1 expression in three chordoma cell lines and nine chordoma tissue samples by western blot. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on a chordoma tissue microarray (TMA) that contained 78 tissue specimens. We also correlated the expression of PD-L1 and TILs with clinical outcomes. PD-L1 protein expression was demonstrated to be induced by IFN-. in both UCH1 and UCH2 cell lines. Across nine human chordoma tissue samples, PD-L1 protein was differentially expressed. 94.9% of chordoma samples showed positive PD-L1 expression in the TMA. The expression score of PD-L1 for metastatic chordoma tumors was significant higher as compared with non-metastatic chordoma tumors. Expression of PD-L1 protein significantly correlates with the presence of elevated TILs, which correlates with metastasis. In summary, our study showed high levels of PD-L1 are expressed in chordoma, which is correlated with the prevalence of TILs. The current study suggests targeting PD-L1 may be a novel immunotherapeutic strategy for chordoma clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据