4.7 Article

Low prevalence of coeliac disease in patients with systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study of a registry cohort

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 939-943

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes390

关键词

scleroderma; systemic; coeliac disease; signs and symptoms; digestive; gastrointestinal diseases

资金

  1. Scleroderma Foundation
  2. Clinical and Translational Science Center at Weill Cornell Medical Center Clinical [UL1RR024996]
  3. Rudolf Rupert Scleroderma Program at the Hospital for Special Surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. Two prior studies suggested that coeliac disease (CD) has a higher prevalence rate (8%) in SSc than in the general population (1%), but these studies were limited by small numbers and the use of traditional coeliac screening antibody tests, where newer ones with improved accuracy have since emerged. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of CD in a larger SSc population using a more modern serological approach to coeliac testing and to correlate coeliac antibody status with gastrointestinal symptoms. Methods. Stored sera from 72 SSc patients in the Scleroderma Registry at the Hospital for Special Surgery were tested for anti-tissue transglutaminase (traditional) and anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (novel) antibodies. If any of these antibodies were positive, anti-endomysial antibodies were tested and confirmatory small-bowel endoscopy and biopsy were obtained. Registry clinical data were used to determine whether antibody status correlated with gastrointestinal symptoms. Results. The prevalence of coeliac antibodies in our SSc population was 3/72 (4%). No significant differences with respect to gastrointestinal symptoms were seen in the coeliac antibody-positive compared with -negative SSc patients. No cases of confirmed CD were seen in our cohort. Conclusion. Contrary to the only two previously published studies, the low prevalence of CD that we found does not suggest that concurrent CD is a common cause of gastrointestinal complaints in SSc patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据