4.7 Article

Public priorities for joint pain research: results from a general population survey

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 51, 期 11, 页码 2075-2082

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes179

关键词

patient priority; joint pain; survey; logistic regression; latent class analysis; factor analysis

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G9900220]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research
  3. MRC [G0501798] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0501798] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [RP-PG-0407-10386] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods. A question about research priorities was developed in collaboration with the Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre's Research Users' Group. The question was embedded in a postal survey to an existing cohort of adults with self-reported joint pain, aged epsilon 56 years, in North Staffordshire. Respondents were asked to rank their top three priorities for research. Factor mixture modelling was used to determine subgroups of priorities. Results. In all, 1756 (88%) people responded to the survey. Of these, 1356 (77%) gave three priorities for research. Keeping active was rated the top priority by 38%, followed by research around joint replacement (9%) and diet/weight loss (9%). Two clusters of people were identified: 62% preferred lifestyle/self-management topics (e.g. keeping active, weight loss) and 38% preferred medical intervention topics (e.g. joint replacement, tablets). Those who preferred the medical options tended to be older and have hip or foot pain. Conclusion. This study has provided population data on priorities for joint pain research expressed by a large cohort of older people who report joint pain. The most popular topics for research were linked to lifestyle and self-management opportunities. Pharmaceutical and invasive interventions, despite being common topics of research, are of less importance to these respondents than non-medical topics. Specific research questions will be generated from this study with collaboration of the patient's group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据