4.7 Article

Anti-NR2A antibody as a predictor for neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 50, 期 9, 页码 1578-1585

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq408

关键词

Systemic lupus erythematosus; N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; Neuropsychiatric involvement; Autoantibody

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The aim of this study is to establish a detection method for anti-N- methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 2A (NR2A) antibody and to evaluate the relationship between anti-NR2A antibody and various organ involvement in SLE. Methods. Serum anti-NR2A antibody was measured by ELISA using a peptide with a core of either DWEYS or DWDYS as autoantigen. Additionally, clinical characteristics were compared between 27 anti-NR2A antibody-positive (P group) and 80 antibody-negative (N group) SLE patients using DWDYS peptide. Results. The optical density (OD) values of anti-NR2A antibody using DWDYS and DWEYS peptides correlated significantly (r = 0.94, P < 0.0001). The median OD value was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) with DWDYS. Additionally, the SLEDAI was significantly higher (P = 0.023) in the P group. The frequency of neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) was significantly higher (P = 0.0002) in the P group, although the frequencies of serositis and nephritis were not statistically significant. Significant correlations were found between anti-NR2A antibody and leucocyte count (r(s) = -0.31, P = 0.001) and haemoglobin (r(s) = -0.42, P < 0.0001), although no correlation was found between anti-NR2A antibody and the titre of anti-dsDNA antibody. NPSLE was the most significant independent variable (P = 0.0008) associated with anti-NR2A antibody positivity, as estimated by multiple linear regression analysis. Conclusion. Serum anti-NR2A antibody can be associated with the complication of NPSLE and may indicate the involvement of non-nervous tissue. The use of peptides that include DWDYS is preferable to detect anti-NR2A antibody in ELISA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据