4.7 Article

Distinct cytokine profiles of systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated macrophage activation syndrome with particular emphasis on the role of interleukin-18 in its pathogenesis

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 49, 期 9, 页码 1645-1653

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq133

关键词

Macrophage activation syndrome; Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis; Interleukin-18

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods. Five patients with MAS complicating s-JIA (MAS/s-JIA), 10 with HLH due to EBV infection (EBV-HLH), 22 with KD and 28 healthy controls were analysed. Cytokine concentrations (IL-18, IL-6, neopterin and TNF-alpha receptor Types I and II) were quantified in serum by ELISA. Results were compared with clinical features of MAS/s-JIA, including ferritin concentrations. Results. Serum IL-18 concentrations in MAS/s-JIA patients were significantly higher than those in EBV-HLH or KD patients (P < 0.05). Serum IL-6 concentrations in KD patients were significantly higher than those in EBV-HLH or MAS/s-JIA patients. Serum neopterin concentrations in EBV-HLH patients were significantly higher than those in MAS/s-JIA or KD patients. Serum IL-18 correlated positively with the following measurements of disease activity: CRP, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase and other cytokines (P < 0.05). Serum concentrations of IL-18 in s-JIA patients remained elevated in the inactive phase of disease, whereas clinical parameters and other cytokines normalized. Conclusions. IL-18 may be an important mediator in s-JIA. Although serum Il-18 concentrations correlated with markers of the disease activity, IL-18 concentrations remained elevated even when other markers of disease activity normalized. Serum IL-18 concentration may be a promising indicator of the disease activity. The cytokine release pattern in MAS/HLH is different among patients with different aetiologies. Monitoring the cytokine profile, including IL-18, may be useful for differentiation of MAS/HLH and evaluation of disease activity in s-JIA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据