4.7 Article

Effect of a second, booster, influenza vaccination on antibody responses in quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus: an open, prospective, controlled study

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 1294-1299

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep200

关键词

Systemic lupus erythematosus; Influenza vaccination; Booster vaccination; Antibody responses

资金

  1. Jan Kornelis de Cock Foundation (The Netherlands)
  2. Solvay Pharmaceuticals (Weesp, The Netherlands)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. In SLE, a decreased antibody response on influenza vaccination has been reported. In this study, we assessed whether a booster vaccination could improve antibody responses, as determined by seroprotection rates, in SLE patients. Methods. SLE patients (n = 52) with quiescent disease (SLEDAI <= 4) and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 28) received subunit influenza vaccine in October-December 2007. After 4 weeks, only SLE patients received a second dose of vaccination. Sera were obtained before both vaccinations, and 4 weeks after the second vaccination. At each visit, SLE disease activity was recorded. The haemagglutination inhibition test was used to measure antibody titres. Seroprotection was defined as a titre >= 40. Results. Following the first vaccination, seroprotection rates and geometric mean titres (GMTs) to each vaccine strain increased in both SLE patients and controls to comparable levels. Seroprotection rates in SLE patients after the first vaccination were 86.5% to A/H1N1, 80.8% to A/H3N2 and 61.5% to the B-strain while GMTs were 92.6, 56.2 and 39.2, respectively. Overall, the booster vaccination did not lead to a further rise of seroprotection rates and GMTs in SLE patients. However, in patients not vaccinated in the previous year, GMT and seroconversion rate to A/H1N1 did rise following the booster vaccination. Both influenza vaccinations did not increase SLEDAI scores. Conclusions. Additional value of a booster influenza vaccination in SLE is limited to patients who were not vaccinated in the previous year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据