4.7 Article

Effects of advanced glycation end products on the expression of COX-2, PGE(2) and NO in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 425-431

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem376

关键词

advanced glycation end products; osteoarthritis; chondrocyte; cyclo-oxygenase-2; microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1; nitric oxide; prostaglandin E2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Advanced glycation end products (AGE) accumulate in articular cartilage with age. We investigated the effects of AGE in primary-cultured human OA chondrocytes. Methods. Chondrocytes were cultured with/or without AGE-bovine serum albumin (AGE-BSA) and the expression levels cf inducible nitric oxide (NOS), cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) were evaluated using RT-PCR and western blot analysis. Prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) was analysed by ELISA and nitric oxide (NO) was analysed by Griess reaction assay. Pharmacological studies to elucidate the involved pathway were executed using specific inhibitors of MAPK and receptor for AGE (RAGE). Results. We found that treatment of OA chondrocytes with AGE-BSA increased COX-2, mPGES-1 and NOS mRNA and protein, as well as elevating production of PGE(2) and NO. Pre-treatment with the MAPK inhibitors SP600125 (JNK inhibitor), SB202190 (1)38 inhibitor) or PD98059 (ERK inhibitor) significantly inhibited AGE-BSA induction of COX-2 expression and production of PGE(2). In contrast, SN50, a nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) inhibitor, had no effect on levels of COX-2 and PGE(2). SB202190 and SN50, but not SP600125 and PD98059, decreased AGE-BSA-induced production of NO. Pre-treatment with soluble receptor for AGE (sRAGE) also reduced AGE-stimulated COX-2, NOS and PGE(2), implicating the involvement of RAGE. Conclusions. These results show that AGE may augment inflammatory responses in OA chondrocytes by increasing PGE(2) and NO levels, possibly via the MAPK pathway for PGE(2) and the NF-kappa B pathway for NO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据