4.7 Article

An evaluation of the association between C-reactive protein, the change in C-reactive protein over one year, and all-cause mortality in chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease managed in UK general practice

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 78-82

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken415

关键词

C-reactive protein; Systemic inflammation; Survival; Rheumatoid arthritis; Psoriasis; Ankylosing spondylitis; Psoriatic arthritis

资金

  1. Wyeth Europa Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. To evaluate the association between systemic inflammation, as measured by CRP, and all-cause mortality. To also evaluate the association between change in CRP status (sub-acute, <= 10 mg/l and acute > 10 mg/l) and all-cause mortality. Methods. A cohort of patients was selected from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) data set of anonymized patient-level data from UK general practice. Patients were selected if they had a diagnosis of RA, psoriasis, AS or PsA. Survival was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models (CPHMs). Results. A total of 11 362 cases had at least one CRP measurement. Analysis grouped by each additional unit increase in log-CRP (range 1-6) across the observed range was associated with a 21% increase in the hazard ratio (HR) of death, after controlling for cardiovascular risk factors (P < 0.001). This observation was consistent in separate analysis of cases with either RA or psoriasis. Repeated CRP observations around 1 yr apart were recorded in 2802 subjects. After controlling for confounding factors, in cases whose CRP changed from sub-acute (<= 10 mg/l) to acute (> 10 mg/l), the HR for death increased 2-fold (P < 0.001) relative to cases whose CRP remained sub-acute. In comparison, among those subjects whose CRP was reduced from acute to sub-acute, the HR was virtually identical to those who stayed sub-acute (P = 0.571 Conclusions. CRP level predicted all-cause mortality after standardization for traditional risk factors, as did change in CRP status from sub-acute to acute observed over 1 yr.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据