4.7 Article

A novel paradigm for dendritic cells as effectors of cartilage destruction

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 502-507

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep040

关键词

Dendritic cells; Cartilage destruction; Collagen resorption; Tumour necrosis factor-

资金

  1. Arthritis Research Campaign [16361]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Dendritic cells (DCs) are enriched in RA synovium and have been implicated in the pathogenesis of RA primarily through their ability to present autoantigen and activate T cells. However, whether DCs play an effector role in cartilage destruction is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DCs can induce collagen release from cartilage and the mechanism involved. Methods. Human monocyte-derived DCs (mDCs) were activated with CD40 ligand (CD40L) to mimic DCT-cell interaction, and supernatants were incubated with cartilage explants. Hydroxyproline was assessed as a measure of collagen release and collagenolytic activity was measured by a bioassay using tritiated collagen. TNF- in DC supernatants was measured by specific ELISA. Results. Supernatants from CD40L-activated mDCs, but not unstimulated mDCs, strongly induced the destruction of cartilage collagen. mDC supernatants did not contain collagenases but did induce collagenolytic activity in cartilage explants. Neutralization of TNF- in mDC supernatants completely abolished collagenolysis. Conclusions. This study shows that mDCs, upon CD40-ligation, induce cartilage collagen degradation through an indirect mechanism via the production of TNF-. Our data suggest a potential important role for mDC-derived TNF- in RA, which is in line with the previously reported observations that DCs are a major source of TNF- in early autoimmune lesions and that anti-TNF- therapeutics effectively suppress joint damage in RA patients. We propose that DCs can act as effectors in cartilage destruction, adding a new aspect to the functional role of DCs in RA pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据