4.3 Article

TCF21 hypermethylation in genetically quiescent clear cell sarcoma of the kidney

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 18, 页码 15828-15841

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4682

关键词

clear cell sarcoma of the kidney; whole genome sequencing; methylation; TCF21; TARID

资金

  1. NCI [U10 CA98543]
  2. National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health [HHSN261200800001E]
  3. NIH [U10CA42326, U10CA98543, U24CA114766, U10CA88131]
  4. American and Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities of St Jude
  5. Pediatric Oncology Center Society for Research
  6. DaDa foundation
  7. Dutch Cancer Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Kidney (CCSK) is a rare childhood tumor whose molecular pathogenesis remains poorly understood. We analyzed a discovery set of 13 CCSKs for changes in chromosome copy number, mutations, rearrangements, global gene expression and global DNA methylation. No recurrent segmental chromosomal copy number changes or somatic variants (single nucleotide or small insertion/deletion) were identified. One tumor with t(10; 17)(q22; p13) involving fusion of YHWAE with NUTM2B was identified. Integrated analysis of expression and methylation data identified promoter hypermethylation and low expression of the tumor suppressor gene TCF21 (Pod-1/capsulin/epicardin) in all CCSKs except the case with t(10; 17) (q22; p13). TARID, the long noncoding RNA responsible for demethylating TCF21, was virtually undetectable in most CCSKs. TCF21 hypermethylation and decreased TARID expression were validated in an independent set of CCSK tumor samples. The presence of significant hypermethylation of TCF21, a transcription factor known to be active early in renal development, supports the hypothesis that hypermethylation of TCF21 and/or decreased TARID expression lies within the pathogenic pathway of most CCSKs. Future studies are needed to functionally verify a tumorigenic role of TCF21 down-regulation and to tie this to the unique gene expression pattern of CCSK.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据