4.3 Article

Oleuropein aglycone induces autophagy via the AMPK/mTOR signalling pathway: a mechanistic insight

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 34, 页码 35344-35357

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6119

关键词

oleuropein aglycone; autophagy; neurodegeneration; AMPK; mTOR; Gerotarget

资金

  1. Region (Regional Research Program for Health)
  2. University of Florence
  3. Ente Cassa di Risparmio grant [2014/0389]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The healthy effects of plant polyphenols, some of which characterize the so-called Mediterranean diet, have been shown to arise from epigenetic and biological modifications resulting, among others, in autophagy stimulation. Our previous work highlighted the beneficial effects of oleuropein aglycone (OLE), the main polyphenol found in the extra virgin olive oil, against neurodegeneration both in cultured cells and in model organisms, focusing, in particular, autophagy activation. In this study we investigated more in depth the molecular and cellular mechanisms of autophagy induction by OLE using cultured neuroblastoma cells and an OLE-fed mouse model of amylod beta (A beta) deposition. We found that OLE triggers autophagy in cultured cells through the Ca2+-CAMKK beta-AMPK axis. In particular, in these cells OLE induces a rapid release of Ca2+ from the SR stores which, in turn, activates CAMKK beta, with subsequent phosphorylation and activation of AMPK. The link between AMPK activation and mTOR inhibition was shown in the OLE-fed animal model in which we found that decreased phospho-mTOR immunoreactivity and phosphorylated mTOR substrate p70 S6K levels match enhanced phospho-AMPK levels, supporting the idea that autophagy activation by OLE proceeds through mTOR inhibition. Our results agree with those reported for other plant polyphenols, suggesting a shared molecular mechanism underlying the healthy effects of these substances against ageing, neurodegeneration, cancer, diabetes and other diseases implying autophagy dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据