4.3 Article

MAP17 (PDZKIP1) as a novel prognostic biomarker for laryngeal cancer

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 14, 页码 12625-12636

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3470

关键词

MAP17; ROS; SGLT; biomarker; larynx/laryngeal cancer

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity, ISCIII [Fis: PI12/00137, RTICC: RD12/0036/0028]
  2. FEDER from Regional Development European Funds (European Union)
  3. Consejeria de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTS-1848]
  4. Consejeria de Salud of the Junta de Andalucia [PI-0306-2012]
  5. ISCIII [PIE13/0004]
  6. FEDER [PIE13/0004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Larynx cancer organ preservation treatments with chemo and radiotherapy have substantially improved laryngoesophageal dysfunction-free survival. However, both of them lead to a high incidence of acute and chronic toxicities and a significant number of patients relapse. To date, there is no evidence available to establish the group of patients that may benefit from preservation approaches and clinical criteria such as primary tumor extension or pretreatment tracheotomy are not validated. MAP17 is a small non-glycosylated membrane protein overexpressed in carcinomas. The tumoral behavior induced by MAP17 is associated with reactive oxygen species production in which SGLT1 seems involved. In this study we found that the levels of MAP17 were related to clinical findings and survival in a cohort of 58 patients with larynx cancer. MAP17 expression is associated with overall survival (p<0.001) and laryngoesophageal dysfunction-free survival (p=0.002). Locoregional control in patients with high MAP17 showed better outcomes than those with low MAP17 (p=0.016). Besides, a positive correlation was observed between MAP17 expression and SGLT (p=0.022) and the combination of high levels of MAP17/SGLT also led to an increased overall survival (p=0,028). These findings suggest that MAP17, alone or in combination with SGLT1, may become a novel predictive biomarker for laryngeal carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据