4.3 Article

Identification of novel long non-coding RNAs in triple-negative breast cancer

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 25, 页码 21730-21739

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4419

关键词

triple-negative breast carcinomas; long non-coding RNAs

资金

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [81125025]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81202103, 31370810, 81172240, 81472714, 81171914]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY15H160002]
  4. Henan outstanding youth fund projects [2014011016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triple-negative breast carcinomas (TNBC) are characterized by particularly poor outcomes, and there are no established markers significantly associated with prognosis. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are subclass of noncoding RNAs that have been recently shown to play critical roles in cancer biology. However, little is known about their mechanistic role in TNBC pathogenesis. In this report, we investigated the expression patterns of lncRNAs from TNBC tissues and matched normal tissues with Agilent Human lncRNA array. We identified 1,758 lncRNAs and 1,254 mRNAs that were differentially expressed (>= 2-fold change), indicating that many lncRNAs are significantly upregulated or downregulated in TNBC. Among these, XR_250621.1 and NONHSAT125629 were the most upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs respectively. qRT-PCR was employed to validate the microarray analysis findings, and results were consistent with the data from the microarrays. GO and KEGG pathway analysis were applied to explore the potential lncRNAs functions, some pathways including microtubule motor activity and DNA replication were identified in TNBC pathogenesis. Our study revealed that a set of lncRNAs were differentially expressed in TNBC tissues, suggesting that they may play role in TNBC. These results shed light on lncRNAs' biological functions and provide useful information for exploring potential therapeutic targets for breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据