4.3 Article

Human CD4+ T cells require exogenous cystine for glutathione and DNA synthesis

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 26, 页码 21853-21864

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5213

关键词

immunology and microbiology section; immune response; immunity; T cell; cystine; glutathione; ribonucleotide reductase; DNA synthesis

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  4. A.P. Moller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Sciences
  5. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF12OC0002036] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. The Danish Cancer Society [R72-A4571] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adaptive immune responses require activation and expansion of antigen-specific T cells. Whereas early T cell activation is independent of exogenous cystine (Cys(2)), T cell proliferation is dependent of Cys(2). However, the exact roles of Cys(2) in T cell proliferation still need to be determined. The aim of this study was to elucidate why activated human T cells require exogenous Cys(2) in order to proliferate. We activated purified naive human CD4(+) T cells and found that glutathione (GSH) levels and DNA synthesis were dependent on Cys(2) and increased in parallel with increasing concentrations of Cys(2). Vice-versa, the GSH synthesis inhibitor L-buthionine-sulfoximine (BSO) and inhibition of Cys(2) uptake with glutamate inhibited GSH and DNA synthesis in parallel. We further found that thioredoxin (Trx) can partly substitute for GSH during DNA synthesis. Finally, we show that GSH or Trx is required for the activity of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), the enzyme responsible for generation of the deoxyribonucleotide DNA building blocks. In conclusion, we show that activated human T cells require exogenous Cys(2) to proliferate and that this is partly explained by the fact that Cys(2) is required for production of GSH, which in turn is required for optimal RNR-mediated deoxyribonucleotide synthesis and DNA replication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据