4.3 Article

Base excision repair-mediated resistance to cisplatin in KRAS(G12C) mutant NSCLC cells

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 30, 页码 30072-30087

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5019

关键词

KRAS; resistance; NSCLC; base excision repair; cisplatin

资金

  1. Fondazione Cariplo [2010-0794]
  2. Italian Association for Cancer Research [IG-12915]
  3. Italian Ministry of Health
  4. project TRANSCAN ERA-NET BIORARE
  5. German Space Agency/German Ministry of Education and Research
  6. project TRANSCAN ERA-NET [01KT1302]
  7. German Cancer AID
  8. FIRC
  9. [110388]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

KRAS mutations in NSCLC are supposed to indicate a poor prognosis and poor response to anticancer treatments but this feature lacks a mechanistic basis so far. In tumors, KRAS was found to be mutated mostly at codons 12 and 13 and a pool of mutations differing in the base alteration and the amino acid substitution have been described. The different KRAS mutations may differently impact on cancerogenesis and drug sensitivity. On this basis, we hypothesized that a different KRAS mutational status in NSCLC patients determines a different profile in the tumor response to treatments. In this paper, isogenic NSCLC cell clones expressing mutated forms of KRAS were used to determine the response to cisplatin, the main drug used in the clinic against NSCLC. Cells expressing the KRAS(G12C) mutation were found to be less sensitive to treatment both in vitro and in vivo. Systematic analysis of drug uptake, DNA adduct formation and DNA damage responses implicated in cisplatin adducts removal revealed that the KRAS(G12C) mutation might be particular because it stimulates Base Excision Repair to rapidly remove platinum from DNA even before the formation of cross-links. The presented results suggest a different pattern of sensitivity/resistance to cisplatin depending on the KRAS mutational status and these data might provide proof of principle for further investigations on the role of the KRAS status as a predictor of NSCLC response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据