4.0 Article

Factors determining the place of delivery in women who attended at least one antenatal consultation in a health facility (Senegal)

期刊

REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE
卷 58, 期 5, 页码 323-329

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2010.05.004

关键词

Prenatal care; Home delivery; Quality; Senegal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgroud. - Home birth remains a major cause of maternal and neonatal deaths in Senegal. The objective of this study was to identify the determinants of home birth in women who attended at least one antenatal consultation during their last pregnancy. Method. - The study was cross-sectional and analytical. It covered a sample of 380 women selected at random among those who have given birth in the last 12 months in the health district Gossas. Data were collected at home using a questionnaire during an interview after informed consent. Multiple logistic regression was used to explore the determinants of childbirth at home using the Andersen model. Results. - The mean age was 26.2 +/- 6.1 years. Women were married (97.3%), illiterate (81.8%) and lived in rural areas (78.4%). Available means of transportation at home were car (7.6%), cart (62.9%) or none 29.5%. In addition, 52.2% of the women lived more than 5 km from a health facility. For 59.0% of the women, the prenatal exam was considered satisfactory. The prevalence of home birth was 24%. Factors related to birth at home are polygamous marriage (OR = 2.04 [1.13-3.70]), lack of transportation (OR = 2.11 [1.13-5.01]) and residence more than 5 km from a health facility (OR = 2.68 [1.56-4.16]). Late (3.90 [2.30-6.65]) or low quality (4.27 [2.25-8.10]) prenatal exams were also risk factors. Conclusion. - Home birth is linked to access to health facilities but also to the prenatal consultation. Particular emphasis should be placed on training health care providers to improve the quality of the patients in the structures. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据