4.3 Article

Addiction of pancreatic cancer cells to zinc-finger transcription factor ZIC2

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 29, 页码 28257-28268

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4960

关键词

ZIC2; GLI1; ANXA8; FGFR3; apoptosis

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [21790370, 23790424, 24590456]
  2. Pancreas Research Foundation of Japan
  3. Aikeikai Foundation
  4. Aichi Cancer Research Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24590456, 21790370, 23790424] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activity of GLI transcription factors of Hedgehog signaling is key for various cancer cell properties, especially in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Zinc-finger transcriptional regulators ZIC1 to ZIC5 of ZIC gene family were demonstrated to associate with GLI to increase the nuclear accumulation and transcriptional activity of GLI. Notwithstanding this supportive role for GLI-dependent transcription, it was not fully understood whether ZIC plays an independent role in cancer cell biology. Here, we found that ZIC2 is indispensable in the regulation of PDAC cell apoptosis. We found that human PDAC cell lines uniquely express ZIC2. ZIC2 knockdown induced PDAC cell apoptosis; conversely, ZIC2 over-expression enhanced the cellular proliferation. Through a comprehensive screening, we identified fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 ( FGFR3) and ANNEXIN A8 ( ANXA8) as genes up-regulated by ZIC2 in PDAC cells. The forced expression of these two genes cooperatively rescued the apoptosis of ZIC2-knockdown cells. Immunohistochemical analyses further supported the correlation of ZIC2 expression and these genes in human pancreata harboring PDAC. Intriguingly, the ZIC2-mediated up-regulation of FGFR3 and ANXA8 was indicated to be GLI-independent. This evidence highlights the indispensable role of ZIC2 in regulating cellular proliferation and apoptosis during PDAC development and suggests a potential therapeutic target for PDAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据