4.3 Article

TMEM16A overexpression contributes to tumor invasion and poor prognosis of human gastric cancer through TGF-β signaling

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 13, 页码 11585-11599

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3412

关键词

TMEM16A; invasion; prognosis; gastric cancer; TGF-beta

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81300106]
  2. Provincial Natural Science Fund Project of Guangdong [S2012040006519]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [11YKPY06]
  4. Special Foundation for National Clinical Specialties of China
  5. President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University [2014C015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TMEM16A is a newly identified calcium activated chloride channel, and has been reported to be overexpressed by various solid malignant cancers to promote proliferation and invasion, yet little is known about its role in gastric cancer(GC). Therefore, we investigated the role of TMEM16A in GC and its clinical significance by a retrospective analysis of 367 GC patients, and in vitro study was performed for validation and underlying molecular mechanism. TMEM16A was significantly upregulated and amplified in GC tissues, and its overexpression was positively correlated with disease stage, negatively with patient survival and identified as an independent prognostic factor for patient outcome. A negative correlation between TMEM16A and E-cadherin was found in 367 GC specimens. TMEM16A silencing significantly decreased calcium activated chloride currents, impaired TGF-beta secretion, reduced E-cadherin expression, and inhibited the migration and invasion without affecting proliferation of GC cells (AGS and BGC-823). Supplement of TGF-beta reverted the effects of TMEM16A silencing on E-cadherin expression, cell migration and invasion. In conclusion, TMEM16A promotes invasion and metastasis in GC, and might be a novel prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target in the treatment of GC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据